• 02Sep

    Every year, I set a handful of goals for painting and writing for the year. Twenty paintings completed, for example. Or an average of 4,000 words written every day.

    For 2010, my writing goals were straight-forward. Among them were:

    • Write 1.25 million words in 2010 (including everything from letters home to blog articles to actual fiction)
    • Produce two new novels
    • Consider July Novel Writing Month
    • Consider National Novel Writing Month

    Today, I achieved one of those goals department. Believe it or not, I exceeded 1.25 million total words sometime this morning.

    When I set that goal at the beginning of the year, I thought it was attainable. I had originally thought about setting a goal of one million words, but thought that might be too easy. Looks like maybe 1.25 million was too easy, too.

    At my current pace, the anticipated annual total word count for 2010 is looking like about 1.88 million words. I’m wondering about raising the bar somewhat and adjusting the year end goal upward to an even two million.

    Or maybe even higher than that.

    Part of me is asking why not just coast through the rest of the year.

    But the other part, the part that likes deadlines and challenges, is asking, “Why settle? Why settle for 1.88 million? Why settle for 2 million? Why not make it interesting?”

    Why not, indeed. That is, after all, what gets stories written. All those words.

    Stay tuned….

  • 30Aug

    Proverbs 19.21 says:

    You can make many plans but the LORD’s purpose will prevail. New Living Translation

    Many are the plans in a man’s heart, but it is the LORD’s purpose that prevails. NIV

    In other words, I can set goals, design stories and paintings and do all sorts of scheduling, calendaring, and other things, but God will have His way in the end. If the planning I do is according to His will, it has a better chance of succeeding, but it is still subject to His will. The story he wants told will ultimately be told. The painting He wants painted will ultimately be painted. The work He wants done will ultimately be done.

    The same holds true for daily life. I am often – sometimes constantly – overwhelmed and defeated by the sheer quantity of plans and ideas with which I am presented; some from myself, many from those people around me. Most of the time, my only consolation is that I know there is simply not enough time in the day to do everything and, therefore, most of the plans are simply wishes and words. What this verse tells me is that it doesn’t matter to God what all I plan. God will do what God is going to do regardless.

    It seems, therefore, like the more important question for the Christian is how well the plans he or she devises fit with God’s will. For example, how well do my plans for each painting mesh with what God wants done with each painting, drawing, or sketch? Am I seeking His will or advancing on my own?

    What about my stories? Am I telling the story God wants told or am I telling a story I think should be told or that someone else wants to hear?

    I don’t know what the answer is beyond thinking of Proverbs 16.3, ‘Commit to the LORD whatever you do, and your plans will succeed,’ and combining it with the verse above, then trusting that God will use my best plans and intentions as long as they are within His will.

    Otherwise, He will do what He plans to do anyway and I will suffer the loss. All I can do is what I believe I am led to do and leave the results to God.

  • 28Aug

    Last week I talked about taking the time to get to know and understand the character I thought was supposed to be the male lead in the story, Saving Grace. I spent a lot of time and words on Anderson and followed that up with more time and words this past week before finally writing to the end of the subject on Wednesday or Thursday. What did I gain?

    Quite a lot. For instance,

    • I know what lie Anderson believes about himself. It’s a common lie, one I share with him.
    • I know how that lie affects his decision making and behavior
    • I know how that behavior is manifested through mannerisms
    • I discovered his inner values, those values he holds without really knowing it, and what created those values
    • I know – or have a good idea – which of those values takes precedence when two or more come into conflict
    • I came to a better understanding of the lessons he needs to learn

    Possibly most important, I began to see glimpses of the story he needs to tell. I don’t yet know how it will unfold, though several beginnings have suggested themselves, and I don’t know how it will end. But one thing is becoming increasingly clear. Anderson’s story will probably not be told in the second draft of Saving Grace.

    My next step with Anderson is unclear. There are a lot of things still to figure out, namely who the other characters are (assuming they are not the other characters from Saving Grace) and the structure of the story. But all of that in due time.

    Since Saving Grace is still the story at the top of my writing to-do list, I moved from Anderson to Grace, thinking I would follow up a successful eight or nine days of character work with more successful days of character work. So far, I’ve encountered only one problem, but it hit me in the face immediately, and it’s a big one.

    Grace herself. She is one intimidating lady!

    I’ll confess that part of my problem is that I have always made more solid connections with my male lead characters than with my female lead characters. In my favorite story to date, the female lead and I share artistic talents and a love of horses, so we did make a connection, but the male lead is the character with whom I shared conversations and made all the major connections.

    In my most frequently finished manuscript, Perfect Opportunities, the male lead is the character I had the most fondness for and connections with. The female lead was, truth be told, only the narrator in whom I had little interest and who seemed to be singularly uninteresting. That is not good, since she was also the character telling the story … in first person.

    So it may be that I’m just crossing into new territory here when it comes to taking time to sit down and ‘talk’ with Grace.

    Or it may be that she’s a career Marine either recently or soon-to-be retired.

    Or that she holds two high-powered degrees.

    Or that she lives her faith in a much more fundamental and determined way than I think I do.

    Whatever the case, I honestly feel outgunned by this gal personally, professionally, and spiritually. Yes, I’ve written a complete manuscript with her as the lead character already, but what do I really know about her?

    At the beginning of the week, I made a tentative appointment to ‘meet with her’, but work was still being done with Anderson, so I didn’t have a time line in mind. By the end of the week, with all current work with Anderson behind me, it was time to turn to Grace.

    The preliminary ’staging’ work was done by Friday. I even began reviewing the character work from the first draft to see what I already knew and where might be a good place to start. I thoroughly described the setting in which I envision Grace and the small town that is nearby and jotted down the thoughts and questions that came to mind from that work. I even sketched out the location, making my own ‘floor plan’ of the location just to solidify it in my imagination.

    The real work, the introduction to Grace as a ‘person’ I was meeting didn’t begin until Saturday.

    But Saturday’s are notoriously bad for getting anything done because of the usual weekend distractions. I did manage to work on this project, but only in fits and starts. I worked most industriously on the approach to the interview and I mean that literally. I described the setting as seen in the walk to the isolated homestead where I see at least part of the story taking place.

    I even got almost to the point of first glimpsing the character in her natural habitat, her grandfather’s homestead and chopping wood. Surreptitious observation on my part, but no interaction.

    The good thing about all this is that I have the foundation lain for work next week. I have no further excuses. I’m hoping that by the time Sunday is past and I’m sitting at the computer again on Monday, I’ll know what to do.

    Check in next week to see how well that worked out!

    In the meantime, have a great week and keep on writing.

  • 21Aug

    Writing can be very frustrating work (and, yes, I did chose the word “work” deliberately!).

    Last week’s weekly update post was all about finding the right story.

    You’ll recall I had several potential plots vying for my attention. All of them wanted to participate in Saving Grace.

    Most of them were strong enough to be considered for Saving Grace and all of them had advantages and disadvantages. There was no clear favorite and I was so tied in knots about which one to do that I considered casting lots to make a decision!

    I didn’t cast lots (though it still sounds like a marvelous writing tool), but I have come to an interesting realization.

    Maybe my problem isn’t with having too many plots. Maybe my problem is trying to put the wrong characters into the plots I have. Mm.

    We, as living, breathing human beings, do not like to be pigeon-holed. We rail against it. We struggle against it. Sometimes we have to give in to it because that’s just the way life is, but we never like it.

    So why should a character like it any better?

    The fellow who appeared as the lead male in the first draft of Saving Grace has been throwing fits almost since the story was finished. I don’t think he liked having to die symbolically in that story and I don’t think he liked going into the witness protection program, either. I suppose, given what I’ve come to understand this week, I don’t blame him.

    He has been a thorn in my side, though. My efforts to get the second draft written have prompted me to give him his own story, to pull him back into the second draft, to change his career, his family history, to kill him. Again. Figuratively speaking, of course.

    At mid week this week, I decided to confront him. Ask him some questions to get the ball rolling and see where the conversation led. It started out well, but I don’t mind saying it ended in a standoff. We actually ended up glaring at each other over his office desk. Figuratively speaking, of course.

    Then I had the following rather revealing thought.

    Am I exerting too much influence? Am I putting my words into his mouth? He seems very angry and I’ve never seen anything about him to suggest such hostility. What’s going on here?

    At that point, I stepped away from the computer for a break. On that particular occasion, the break was about ten minutes of silence and letting my mind settle.

    That’s about all the time it took to hear Anderson say, in essence, “Let’s do lunch and chat.”

    I wasn’t getting anywhere the way things were, so that’s what we did. I directed the conversation with such comments as “Tell me about your childhood” and “What would you do if you could do anything in the world and know you’d succeed?” and “What’s the one thing you’d never do?”

    I ended up with nearly 3,200 words on that topic by the end of the day and it was quite enlightening. I learned things I’d never heard before and had never considered.

    By now, you’re no doubt wondering what lunch with Anderson – figuratively speaking, of course! – has to do with finding the right character for Saving Grace. I already have the character, right?

    Sort of.

    I’ve written over 20,000 words on this story this week. Most of it had been with characterization. I am no closer to achieving what I’d hoped to achieve this week than when I started.

    But I am closer to the overall goal.

    All of this struggle led me to the realization that I may be pigeon-holing my characters. After spending parts of three days this week doing nothing but listening to Anderson, I quite suddenly realized that I don’t know anything about him beyond the basics (age, birth date, home town, parents, siblings, work, appearance, etc.). I knew very little about what makes him tick. Why, for example, is he always dressed to the nines?

    The led to the secondary revelation that maybe he’s been such a problem child because I’m trying to force him into a story in which he doesn’t belong.

    So I decided this week to set the story aside for the time being and concentrate on the character. Namely, Anderson. Figure out what makes him tick. What his aspirations are. Why he’s settled for whatever he’s settled for and what lie he believes about himself and about the world in general.

    If, in the course of that work, I discover his story lies somewhere else, partnered with other characters, so be it.

    But if he turns out to be the right place at the right time, then I’ve hit pay dirt and we can tell the story properly.

    Whatever happens, the writing time will have been time well spent. Hopefully, I’ll have learned not to bully my characters, too. Hopefully, I’ll remember it with the next character, so they don’t have to go through the same thing!

    Wishes for a great week to you and keep writing.

  • 18Aug

    Many factors go into writing a powerful, successful story. Strong and interesting characters. A compelling plot. Conflict, obstacles and a strong, believable resolution.

    What is the most important factor? There are as many answers to that question as there are authors and writers. I can sum up the most important thing to my stories  in one word. Desire.

    In other words, what is your story about?

    Do you think you can figure that out as you write? I used to think that, too. It is possible, but it’s also possible to write an entire story without a clear idea of what the lead character is trying to accomplish. I have three or four finished manuscripts to prove it!

    Another way to think about the main desire of your story is to look for the ‘quest’ confronting your characters.

    To illustrate how important it is for your story to have a strong desire or quest, let’s look at a few examples. First, we’ll look at a couple of movies.

    The Fellowship of the Rings

    From the beginning of the first story, Fellowship of the Ring, readers and viewers are told what the quest is. The One Ring must be returned to Mordor, where it can be destroyed in the fire from which it was forged. Failure will allow evil to rule Middle Earth.

    Clearly defining the quest identifies the main desire for the lead characters – get to Mordor and destroy the One Ring. It also immediately sets up conflicts with the characters who want to capture and use the ring.

    Down Periscope

    Again, the quest is identified immediately. The main character is ordered to act the part of a terrorist trying to sneak an outdated, diesel powered sub into a naval harbor and blow up a target. His opponent will be the best and brightest the US Navy has to offer and the stakes on both sides are high: A sub command for the main character and a third star for his primary opponent, who just happens to be a Two Star General with quite a chip on his shoulder.

    Defining the main desire clearly is important for all types of stories, not just action or suspense. Let’s look at some stories from other genres.

    At Home in Mitford, by Jan Karon

    Father Tim’s main desire in the first book of the Mitford series is to overcome his fears of his neighbor and an equally large fear of change to ask her to marry him.

    The Black Stallion Challenged, by Walter Farley

    The main desire in this horse story is getting enough money to rebuild a barn destroyed by fire after it was learned the insurance policy lapsed. It is established in the early chapters of the book and immediately sets up the obstacles of the Black Stallion’s age, his need to return to the race track after retiring and the level of younger competition he has to race.

    The first book is women’s fiction, the second is an children’s book from decades ago. You can see the value and importance of a clearly defined main desire that motivates the characters and keeps the story moving forward in both genres. It is, in fact, important for all genres.

    Still don’t believe it?

    The next time you’re at the movies, see if you can identify the main objective of the plot. What premise did all of the other parts of the plot hang on?

    Could you easily identify that premise or was it only a vague suggestion?

    How engaged in the movie were you? Did it keep you on the edge of your seat or were you more interested in your bucket of popcorn?

    How do you identify your story’s main desire?

    That can be as simple or complex a process as you like.

    If you don’t currently have a story in the works….

    The first place to look is your own life. What things motivate you? Politics? A new job? Reaching the top in your company? A successful marriage? If it motivates you, chances are you can write a compelling story about a character with the same motivation.

    Depending on the type of story you’re writing, you can also look at current events and develop ideas from the stories you see every day.

    There’s always the epic ideas. Saving the planet from invading aliens, uncovering political corruption, revealing a massive, global hoax before it’s too late to thwart its perpetrators. You name it.

    The best place to begin is to simply sit down and write a list of things that get your blood pumping. This is a brainstorming thing, so no editing is allowed. Once something is written down, don’t cross it off or make changes. Just write the next thing. Write as many as you can. If it helps to give yourself a time limit, set a time limit. I sometimes try fifteen or thirty minutes for an exercise like this and actually set a timer.

    Afterward, give the list time to cool off and your mind time to digest what you’ve written. Then look at that list and see what looks good. This is the time to edit. I advise you not to cross anything off that list. You never know when something might work for another story. But look at the most interesting ideas and begin to play with them. See what you might be able to do with them, where they might lead.

    If you currently have a story in the works….

    What is compelling your characters through the story? What does your character want or need to do?

    If you don’t already know that or can’t put it into a concise, easy to remember sentence, this might be a good time to sit down with the story so far and see what’s already there. Ask yourself the following questions.

    What made me want to write this story?

    What makes the main character care about this story?

    What makes the other characters care?

    Why should anyone care about this story?

    Ask yourself any other questions that come to mind, too. Until you can answer this question convincingly, your story will suffer.

    It will also be a lot more difficult to stay on track if you don’t know what your character’s main Desire is, why he or she has to have it, what is waiting to keep them from getting it and how they eventually succeed or fail.

    It really is that important.

  • 16Aug

    A couple of days ago, I read a post that really got me thinking. The post was on the subject of information and asked the question: Is there too much information available these days?

    The combination of the original post and my response prompted a train of thought that continued all day and led down more than one interesting speculative trail.

    The most obvious was my own use of information and my unending hunger for more information on specific subjects. Painting, for example. Or writing. If I read something that tells me I need to up the ante in a story, I want to know how. If I then read how to do that, I want to see examples.

    When I was learning the Flemish painting technique, I started with basic information, but discovered that I soon wanted more. Every scrap of data leads not to satisfaction of the question, but to a more refined question.

    For me personally, one of the reasons is that I want to know everything before I do anything. To some degree, I have failed to hone the ability to digest information slowly, to see how it applies to my work and to make use of it. It’s not the amount of information, in other words. It’s my lack of putting it to use. Sort of like eating chocolates a handful at a time without taking much time to chew or digest them before moving on to the next treat.

    That’s not how the Christian has been called to live. The calling itself is an act of faith. We’re not told every little thing about a walk with Christ or a personal relationship with the Heavenly Father or even what’s going to happen to us tomorrow. We are convicted of our need for salvation and asked to accept the gift on faith.

    Most of the big things we’ll be called to do will also require faith. Some examples.

    If you went to college, did you know everything there was to know about the college life, the classes, and extracurricular activities before you sent in your application? No!

    If you’re married, did you know everything there was to know about what it living with someone else was going to involve, how to handle money, kids, and work before you said “I do”? Nope. ‘Fraid not.

    What about your job? You didn’t go into that fully apprised of the tiniest detail and every possible outcome, did you?

    And your family? You still don’t know everything there is to know about raising a successful family no matter how far along the path you are.

    When it comes to life in general, we are all walking a path along which we can see only a few steps in the best of times. We don’t know everything. We will never know everything. With or without God, we walk in faith of some kind.

    At the end of that long chain of reasoning and pondering, I came to the realization that I’m just as bad as everyone else when it comes to seeking knowledge instead of faith. When I am called to write a particular story, I want to answer every possible question before I start writing. It’s almost as if I think that if I can answer all of my questions, I’ll know I’m really supposed to do the work.

    That’s not the way it’s supposed to be. God will provide the answers, but only in His good time. I will know the answers t some questions and quite likely will never know the answers to many of my questions. Even if I do, I probably won’t understand the answers most of the time. But that’s not my job.

    My job is to say, Yes, LORD, when He asks me to do something.

    If I’m properly in tune, the response will be immediate, too. Without any questions.

  • 14Aug

    My current story went through quite a few contortions this week.

    Come to think of it, I did, too.

    I continued to combine work on the story with coursework and reading through Plot & Structure (James Scott Bell), but it didn’t take long to realize the reading was getting way ahead of where the story currently is. For most of the week, I was still trying to identify the basics of goal, motivation and conflict with my writing while reading about the second and third acts, writing powerful scenes and creating complex plots. Not a good fit!

    But Plot & Structure was helpful. Early in the week, I read a suggestion that writers choose an opposition character who is a human. That seems pretty basic, I know, but in two of the four ideas that came out of the previous week’s work, the opposition ‘character’ was society at large, the environment through which the character passed, general hardships or various combinations of those things. That sort of thing can be done, but the moment I read that piece of advise, I realized that two of my ideas were best saved for later writing efforts. I was down to two basic ideas.

    I continued to read the chapters and do the assignments, but the assignments and story planning had less and less to do with each other with every day that passed.

    What the book couldn’t help me decide, my crit partners could. I wrote summaries for each of my ideas, pondered, rewrote, pondered some more, then submitted them to the group for their opinions. Since I can see the advantages and disadvantages of each idea, I was hoping a few objective opinions would help clear the muddle.

    It did, but not in a way I anticipated. Almost everyone suggested what I had was a two-book series. I had been thinking the same thing, but having others confirm my thoughts opened a couple of new doors.

    It also seemed to bring me up against a good bout of writer’s block. I struggled with that Thursday and Friday, seeming to take tiny steps forward and major steps backward. I salved my creative conscience by getting a lot done in the studio, but in the back of my mind was that nagging problem.

    I don’t know what to do next!

    One of the things James Scott Bell recommends repeatedly is stepping away from a writing project periodically to just relax. That seems an awful lot like doing nothing and I don’t like doing nothing, so I’ve resisted it mightily. But Neal was gone most of Saturday morning and I hadn’t been on the top of my game physically or mentally most of the week, so I decided to do some serious relaxing.

    It took a while to get properly relaxed and to idle my mind sufficiently, but once I did, questions began to present themselves. Questions like:

    What is Grace’s story?

    Who is the real lead character and what is their story question?

    Who is their opposition and why?

    Do I have the right lead character in the right situation?

    That proved to be the most important question of all. It provoked a good deal of thought and led to a few interesting conclusions, including the realization that I might be trying to wedge an existing lead character into a story where she doesn’t belong.

    The rest of Saturday’s working time was given to exploring that idea more fully. I wanted to determine if I was, indeed, trying to force a story. If I was, how could it be best resolved? A new story for the lead character? A new lead character for the current story? Are there really two stories here?

    In all of that, I found something that’s been missing for some time in my writing. Energy! Excitement! Yes, maybe even a spark of passion.

    It’ll be Monday before I do any more work. It will be interesting to see if Saturday’s excitement survives until Monday, but I was pleased to end the week on a positive note, even if it looks like the process took a backward step.

    A good weekend to you and keep writing!

  • 07Aug

    Last week, I began the serious business of plotting a course for the second draft of my 2009 National Novel Writing Month manuscript. After sitting idle since sometime this spring, it’s time to put the manuscript to work again.

    I’m coupling story work with a second reading of James Scott Bell’s excellent book, Plot & Structure. Exercises are included at the end of each chapter and I’m doing those, but I’m going one step further and doing some of the exercises twice, the second time for the story.

    In two days of work, I finished three chapters. Not only did I get a refresher course on designing stories, but I put the information to immediate use in a hands-on manner by beginning to work out the basics on my own novel. I’ve always been one of those people who learns best when I can put information to immediate use, see how what I’ve read applies to what I do and try different things with the information in ‘the heat of the moment’.

    A good amount of time and a lot of words went into the process. That doesn’t count any of the thinking, pondering, questioning and leaps of faith that were also involved.

    When the work week ended, I had four legitimate plot paths for the second draft. That didn’t surprise me, since I’d considered each one of them at some point previously and because I did next to no planning for the first draft. That was strictly seat-of-the-pants writing!

    Through that extended process, I identified:

    • The disturbance for each of those four ideas;
    • The first door of no return, which propels the main character into the story for all four;
    • The second door of no return, which propels the main character into what I like to refer to as The Final Conflict; and,
    • The resolution for one of the ideas.

    Those are only the mile posts in the journey of novel writing; the markers for the big things that move the story. There are gaps between those mileposts. A lot of gaps. Enough gaps to get lost in.

    But I do have the mileposts mapped out both in text form and in a linear diagram, both of which should help me stay on course.

    The goal for the rest of the weekend is to let the story and the lessons rest and to give my subconscious time to chew on the material. Like everything else, it is easier said than done.

    A good weekend to you and keep writing!

  • 01Aug

    With this article, I begin discussing something it took me a long time to get a firm grasp of. Sometimes, I still despair of ever fully understanding the process of finding the message for a new novel.

    Let me begin by saying one of my favorite authors is the Scottish writer, George MacDonald. I first encountered George MacDonald’s writings in the late 1980s, when author Michael Phillips began editing them for the modern reader and republishing them through Bethany House.

    I was struggling with my own writing at the time, wondering whether it was an entertaining but useless hobby or something I could really sink my teeth into.

    MacDonald’s historical, Christ-based novels about the men and women of 1800s Scotland were exactly what I needed exactly when I needed it. In those novels, I found the inspiration and enjoyment inherent in the kinds of stories I hope one day to write. Many of them are still available through Michael Phillips’ web site.

    Many years passed between my first discovery of these wonderful tales and my next encounter with them in 2009. Reading them that summer was like getting re-acquainted with old friends. I devoured them and looked for others at the local library. As happened the first time, I found new insight into the craft of writing in reading MacDonald’s work. As a result, I began looking at my writing in a different way.

    George MacDonald always centered his novels around one or two central Christian themes and often-times, the characters present very challenging questions to each other and, subsequently, to the reader. For example, in The Curate’s Awakening, the question asked of the curate and which gets the story going is “do you really believe everything you preach?”

    The idea that my writing (and my art) are tools God has given me to use in the expansion of His kingdom is something that had been slowly dawning in my awareness for some time. I’ve always treated my painting that way, but writing? That’s always been more for my own entertainment than anything else, though there is that latent hope that something profitable comes of it eventually.

    As a result of all this reading and pondering and some excellent sermons at church, I began seeking messages around which to build my own stories. Something more meaningful than whodunit or will the boy get the girl. Some very thought-provoking ideas were presented and, in some cases, I knew the characters who asked the questions.

    All stories present a message of some type. No writer ever writes without hoping to convey his or her point of view, regardless of protests to the contrary. Whether deliberately woven into the story or merely the result of it, there will be a message.

    Writers who are Christians first are even more aware of this imperative which is also an opportunity. What is the message woven into your story? Forgiveness? Grace? Mercy? Redemption? Is it the main plot or does it run through the subplots of the story? Do you have to know what the message is before you start writing?

    Ah! There is the real question.

    Unfortunately, there isn’t a carved-in-stone answer for that. Every writer strikes upon the message of their story differently. All I can do is share what has worked for me and for others who have struggled with the same issue.

    Many writers do not start a story without first identifying the guiding scripture. Personally, there are several passages in the Old and New Testaments that beg me to be turned into a novel. If a particular scripture speaks to you, explore ways to illustrate that scripture through fiction.

    Do you struggle with something in your own life? Is there some besetting sin you are forced to confront over and over, sometimes on a daily basis? I know of at least one author who whose first Christian book dealt with an issue she was dealing with herself. Through the voice and actions of her main character, she explored her own weaknesses and God’s great love and abounding mercy. That became the message for that book and that book became the first of a four-book series.

    For many stories, though, the message is something that is more the responsibility of the reader than the writer. After you’ve told the best story you can tell, your reader will take from it whatever is closest to their personal needs at the time.

    Since I’ve recently seen The Fellowship of the Rings again, let’s consider it as an example of message.

    The first time I saw the movie, I was aware of the main goals and main desires in the story. The main desire is so clearly stated (more on desire next time) that it’s next to impossible to miss.

    But the message?

    I don’t remember that I came away with a message the first time I saw the movie other than the basic message to never give up. That message was still there this time, but I clearly heard another message, as well.

    In one scene, after a violent confrontation, Frodo told Gandolf he wished he’d never been given the One Ring and that he would give anything to make things go back to the way they’d been before.

    Gandolf told him he had the ring because he was supposed to have it. He was in the time and place he was supposed to be in. The only question he had to answer was what he did with that time.

    I don’t remember that the first time I saw the movie. It was such a major impact this time around that I can still see the scene and I can still feel my own tears in response in watching the movie this time. Why? Because I’ve wondered why I’m living these days and why I seem to have been given work I’d really rather not have. I am in Frodo’s shoes in some respects, so I heard Tolkien’s message just as clearly as Frodo heard Gandolf’s.

    In another day and time, that message might mean little or nothing and another one will be important.

    I don’t know if J.R.R. Tolkien planned his story that way or if he was just writing. I do know God used his work to convey a wide range of messages. I believe He uses the writing of every Christian and, yes, every non-Christian writer in the same way. What impacts one reader will be irrelevant to another.

    So what’s the conclusion? Just this. If God has given you a clear and concise message for your book, go with God in developing it and writing it. If not, don’t despair. Of all the things that readers find in stories, the message is the most varied and, sometimes, ethereal. Don’t worry if you don’t have a clear idea of your message to begin with. There are things you will need to be concerned with more than that.

    We will begin discussing those by talking about Desire (with a capital “d”) next time. Until then,

  • 28Jul

    I follow a handful of blogs through email subscriptions and read them regularly.

    Today, two of them included posts I found very relevant personally and thought many of you might like to read, as well.

    The first blog is Randy Ingermanson’s Advanced Fiction Writing blog. The post I read this morning was titled Giving Yourself Permission to be Dreadful and is exactly what I needed to read this morning. If you’re waiting to finish – or even start! – your first novel until your writing skills are sharply honed, you need to read this post.

    The second blog is Rachelle Gardner’s Rants & Ramblings On Life as a Literary Agent. The post I read this afternoon is titled The Blessing of Everyday Tasks. I’ve been touting the benefits of doing dishes by hand to my artist friends for years, claiming the process relaxes my hands and my mind while accomplishing something truly worthwhile. It’s no surprise to me to learn the benefits of silence and menial tasks to the writing process.

    Both of these writing blogs are packed with excellent information, but I found both of them especially helpful today and wanted to pass that information on to you.